Legislature(2013 - 2014)

2013-04-12 Senate Journal

Full Journal pdf

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1188
HB 4                                                                                                                          
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) "An Act relating to the Alaska Gasline                                                                          
Development Corporation; establishing the Alaska Gasline                                                                        
Development Corporation as an independent public corporation of the                                                             
state; establishing and relating to the in-state natural gas pipeline fund;                                                     
making certain information provided to or by the Alaska Gasline                                                                 
Development Corporation and its subsidiaries exempt from inspection                                                             
as a public record; relating to the Joint In-State Gasline Development                                                          
Team; relating to the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation; relating to                                                           
judicial review of a right-of-way lease or an action or decision related                                                        
to the development or construction of an oil or gas pipeline on state                                                           
land; relating to the lease of a right-of-way for a gas pipeline                                                                
transportation corridor, including a corridor for a natural gas pipeline                                                        

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1189
that is a contract carrier; relating to the cost of natural resources,                                                          
permits, and leases provided to the Alaska Gasline Development                                                                  
Corporation; relating to procurement by the Alaska Gasline                                                                      
Development Corporation; relating to the review by the Regulatory                                                               
Commission of Alaska of natural gas transportation contracts; relating                                                          
to the regulation by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska of an in-                                                              
state natural gas pipeline project developed by the Alaska Gasline                                                              
Development Corporation; relating to the regulation by the Regulatory                                                           
Commission of Alaska of an in-state natural gas pipeline that provides                                                          
transportation by contract carriage; repealing the statutes relating to                                                         
the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority and making                                                                         
conforming changes; exempting property of a project developed by the                                                            
Alaska Gasline Development Corporation from property taxes before                                                               
the commencement of commercial operations; and providing for an                                                                 
effective date" was before the Senate in third reading.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator French called the Senate. The call was satisfied.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Senator French moved that the bill be returned to second reading for                                                            
the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1.                                                                
Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator French offered Amendment No. 1 :                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Page 36, line 31:                                                                                                               
     Delete "AS 42.08.320(b) - (d)"                                                                                             
     Insert "AS 42.08.320(b) and (c)"                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Page 44, lines 9 - 13:                                                                                                          
     Delete "(1) conclude that a precedent agreement or related                                                                 
contract negotiated at arm's length between the parties is just and                                                             
reasonable unless the commission finds that unlawful market activity                                                            
affected the rate or unfair dealing, such as fraud or duress, affected the                                                      
formation of the contract;                                                                                                      
              (2)"                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Page 44, line 21, through page 45, line 4:                                                                                      
     Delete all material.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Reletter the following subsection accordingly.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1190
Page 45, line 5:                                                                                                                
     Delete "If a precedent agreement or related contract is not arm's                                                          
length, the"                                                                                                                    
     Insert "The"                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Page 45, lines 7 - 10:                                                                                                          
     Delete "normally applied under AS 42.06.140. If the commission                                                             
is reviewing a precedent agreement under (c)(2) of this section, the                                                            
commission may consider the in-state natural gas pipeline carrier's                                                             
approved recourse tariff, including the cost data underlying the tariff"                                                        
     Insert "applied under AS 42.06.140"                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator                                                               
Fairclough objected.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 1                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  7   NAYS:  13   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Egan, Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Olson, Wielechowski                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                                   
Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Stedman, Stevens                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 1 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved that the bill be returned to second                                                                  
reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being                                                                     
Amendment No. 2. Without objection, the bill was returned to second                                                             
reading.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1191
Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 2 :                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Page 1, line 3, following "fund;":                                                                                            
     Insert "allowing the legislature to consider disallowing an in-                                                          
state natural gas pipeline project;"                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 11, following line 26:                                                                                                     
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
          "(g)  The corporation or other person may not start                                                                   
     construction of an in-state natural gas pipeline developed by the                                                          
     corporation without presenting details of the project to the                                                               
     legislature. The legislature shall have 60 days during a legislative                                                       
       session to decide whether to disallow the project as proposed."                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2.                                                                 
Senator McGuire objected.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 2                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  4   NAYS:  16   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson,                                                                       
Stedman, Stevens                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 2 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved that the bill be returned to second                                                                  
reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being                                                                     
Amendment No. 3. Without objection, the bill was returned to second                                                             
reading.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1192
Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 3 :                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Page 8, line 22, following "consumption":                                                                                       
     Insert ", except that the corporation or a subsidiary of the                                                               
corporation may not issue bonds or make other financial commitments                                                             
to finance the construction of an in-state natural gas pipeline until the                                                       
corporation has received firm transportation commitments to transport                                                           
400,000,000 cubic feet a day of natural gas in the in-state natural gas                                                         
pipeline"                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 17, line 19:                                                                                                               
     Delete "The"                                                                                                               
     Insert "Except as provided in AS 31.25.080(a)(2), the"                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3.                                                                 
Senator Fairclough objected.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 3                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  4   NAYS:  16   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson,                                                                       
Stedman, Stevens                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 3 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator French moved that the bill be returned to second reading for                                                            
the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 4.                                                                
Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1193
Senator French offered Amendment No. 4 :                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Page 1, lines 7 - 8:                                                                                                            
     Delete "relating to judicial review of a right-of-way lease or an                                                        
action or decision related to the development or construction of an                                                           
oil or gas pipeline on state land;"                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Page 33, lines 2 - 29:                                                                                                          
     Delete all material.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Page 55, lines 17 - 18:                                                                                                         
     Delete "Except as provided in AS 38.35.200(c), a"                                                                          
     Insert "A"                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Page 59, line 3:                                                                                                                
     Delete "lines"                                                                                                             
     Insert "line"                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Page 59, line 4:                                                                                                                
     Delete "(1)"                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Page 59, lines 6 - 8:                                                                                                           
     Delete "carrier"; and                                                                                                      
          (2)  AS 38.35.200 from "Judicial review of decisions of                                                               
commissioner on application" to "Judicial review.""                                                                             
     Insert "carrier.""                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator                                                               
Fairclough objected.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 4                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  5   NAYS:  15   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1194
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Gardner, Olson, Wielechowski                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Stedman,                                                                     
Stevens                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 4 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved that the bill be returned to second                                                                  
reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being                                                                     
Amendment No. 5. Without objection, the bill was returned to second                                                             
reading.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski offered Amendment No. 5 :                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Page 11, following line 26:                                                                                                     
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
          "(g)  The corporation shall, to the maximum extent possible,                                                          
     use contractors and suppliers in the state in order to benefit from                                                        
     the experience of workers and businesses in the state in arctic                                                            
     engineering and construction."                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Page 12, line 26:                                                                                                               
     Delete the second occurrence of "and"                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Page 13, line 1, following "carrier":                                                                                           
     Insert "; and                                                                                                              
              (4)  the person that submits the application for the right-                                                       
     of-way lease commits to hire residents of the state and to contract                                                        
     with businesses in the state to the maximum extent allowed by law                                                          
     for the construction and operation of a natural gas pipeline"                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5.                                                                 
Senator McGuire objected.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1195
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 5                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  8   NAYS:  12   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Bishop, Egan, Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Micciche,                                                                 
Wielechowski                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins,                                                                  
Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Olson, Stedman, Stevens                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 5 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved that the bill be returned to second reading for                                                           
the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 6.                                                                
Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 6 :                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Page 46, lines 12 - 14:                                                                                                         
     Delete all material and insert:                                                                                            
          "(d)  A contract carriage certificate issued by the commission                                                        
              (1)  shall require that a public utility in the state have                                                        
     priority over other shippers if the transportation capacity of an                                                          
     in-state natural gas pipeline is reduced; and                                                                              
              (2)  may include other reasonable terms and conditions                                                            
     that are consistent with this chapter and that are for the mutual                                                          
     benefit of the in-state natural gas pipeline and the public."                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6.                                                                      
Senator Fairclough objected.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1196
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 6                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  4   NAYS:  16   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson,                                                                       
Stedman, Stevens                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 6 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved that the bill be returned to second reading for                                                           
the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 7.                                                                
Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 7 :                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Page 7, line 20:                                                                                                                
     Delete "personnel"                                                                                                         
     Insert "president, vice-president, director of administrative                                                              
services, and controller"                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 33, line 30, through page 34, line 1:                                                                                      
     Delete all material and insert:                                                                                            
"* Sec. 14. AS 39.25.110 is amended by adding a new paragraph to                                                              
read:                                                                                                                           
              (44)  the president, vice-president, director of                                                                  
     administrative services, and controller of the Alaska Gasline                                                              
     Development Corporation."                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7.                                                                      
Senator McGuire objected.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1197
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 7                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  5   NAYS:  15   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Egan, Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                                   
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson,                                                                       
Stedman, Stevens                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 7 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved that the bill be returned to second reading for                                                           
the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 8.                                                                
Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner offered Amendment No. 8 :                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Page 1, line 3, following "fund;":                                                                                            
     Insert "requiring legislative approval for the transfer of certain                                                       
interests in an in-state natural gas pipeline project;"                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 8, line 14, following "may":                                                                                               
     Insert ", subject to (g) of this section,"                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Page 9, line 4, following "(6)":                                                                                                
     Insert "subject to (g) of this section,"                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Page 11, following line 26:                                                                                                     
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
          "(g) The corporation may not enter into an agreement with                                                             
     another person for joint ownership of an in-state natural gas                                                              
     pipeline developed by the corporation or transfer or otherwise                                                             
     dispose of all or part of an in-state natural gas pipeline project                                                         
     developed by the corporation without legislative approval."                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1198
Page 46, lines 19 - 20:                                                                                                         
     Delete "The commission shall summarily approve a transfer not                                                              
involving a substantial change in ownership."                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Gardner moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8.                                                                      
Senator McGuire objected.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 8                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  5   NAYS:  15   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Gardner, Olson, Wielechowski                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Stedman,                                                                     
Stevens                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 8 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE                                                                               
BILL NO. 4(FIN) was automatically in third reading.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Micciche moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain                                                                   
from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objections were heard and                                                            
Senator Micciche was required to vote.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Senator Meyer moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from                                                                 
voting due to a conflict of interest. Objections were heard and Senator                                                         
Meyer was required to vote.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR                                                                         
SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 4(FIN) "An Act relating to                                                                        
the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation; establishing the Alaska                                                             
Gasline Development Corporation as an independent public                                                                        
corporation of the state; establishing and relating to the in-state natural                                                     
gas pipeline fund; making certain information provided to or by the                                                             
Alaska Gasline Development Corporation and its subsidiaries exempt                                                              

2013-04-12                     Senate Journal                      Page 1199
from inspection as a public record; relating to the Joint In-State                                                              
Gasline Development Team; relating to the Alaska Housing Finance                                                                
Corporation; relating to judicial review of a right-of-way lease or an                                                          
action or decision related to the development or construction of an oil                                                         
or gas pipeline on state land; relating to the lease of a right-of-way for                                                      
a gas pipeline transportation corridor, including a corridor for a natural                                                      
gas pipeline that is a contract carrier; relating to the cost of natural                                                        
resources, permits, and leases provided to the Alaska Gasline                                                                   
Development Corporation; relating to procurement by the Alaska                                                                  
Gasline Development Corporation; relating to the review by the                                                                  
Regulatory Commission of Alaska of natural gas transportation                                                                   
contracts; relating to the regulation by the Regulatory Commission of                                                           
Alaska of an in-state natural gas pipeline project developed by the                                                             
Alaska Gasline Development Corporation; relating to the regulation by                                                           
the Regulatory Commission of Alaska of an in-state natural gas                                                                  
pipeline that provides transportation by contract carriage; repealing the                                                       
statutes relating to the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority and                                                           
making conforming changes; exempting property of a project                                                                      
developed by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation from                                                                    
property taxes before the commencement of commercial operations;                                                                
and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was                                                             
taken with the following result:                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSSSHB 4(FIN)                                                                                                               
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                                                                   
Effective Date                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  15   NAYS:  5   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                                     
Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson,                                                                       
Stedman, Stevens                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Ellis, French, Gardner, Wielechowski                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR                                                                             
HOUSE BILL NO. 4(FIN) passed the Senate.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                              
the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date                                                            
clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred                                                          
to the Secretary for engrossment.